There is no substantive content available to analyze from this submission. The source is a Reddit thread title only — no article body, no discussion content, no data, no quotes, and no research context were provided. Writing a professional analytical summary under these conditions would require fabricating facts, statistics, or pilot experiences that may or may not exist in the actual thread, which would be misleading to readers.
To produce a accurate, useful analysis on instrument rating timelines under Part 61 training, the actual Reddit thread content (or a comparable sourced article) would need to be included. Alternatively, a published study, AOPA report, FAA data release, or editorial piece on the subject would provide a solid foundation for the kind of third-person, declarative analysis this format calls for.