LIVE · BRIEFING WIRE
FlightLogic Brief Daily aviation wire
← Reddit
● RDT COMM ·AgitatedDifficulty66 ·June 11, 2026 ·06:16Z

Asiana safety questions

A passenger flying on Asiana Airlines flight OZ1035 from Tokyo Haneda to Seoul Gimpo observed several safety concerns including the absence of a safety briefing, an infant held unsecured in arms during takeoff and landing, and a remove-before-flight pin left in place on an emergency exit slide throughout the flight. The passenger, an experienced frequent flyer, questioned whether these practices represent standard procedures and considered reporting the incidents to Korean aviation authorities.
Detailed analysis

A passenger account of Asiana Airlines flight OZ1035, operating between Tokyo Haneda and Seoul Gimpo, raises three distinct safety concerns that vary considerably in technical severity and regulatory significance. The flight, a short-haul international segment crossing the Korea Strait, would fall under Korean Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT) oversight and must comply with ICAO Annex 6 standards for commercial air transport operations. Each concern described — an absent safety briefing, an unrestrained infant during critical phases of flight, and an apparent "Remove Before Flight" pin left installed on an emergency exit component — carries different implications when evaluated against applicable regulations and standard operating procedures.

The absence of a pre-departure or pre-takeoff safety demonstration, if accurately observed, would represent a direct violation of ICAO standards and Korean Civil Aviation Act requirements. ICAO Annex 6, Part I, mandates passenger safety briefings covering seatbelt use, emergency exit locations, oxygen equipment, and flotation devices on all commercial passenger flights, including those conducted over water. Asiana, as a major IATA carrier operating under Korean Air Operator Certificate, is obligated to conduct either a live crew demonstration or an approved video safety briefing on every flight. The possibility that the briefing occurred but was missed by this passenger — due to boarding timing, language barrier, or attention — cannot be ruled out, but the claim is operationally credible given anecdotal reports of procedural lapses at some carriers. For professional operators, the regulatory baseline here is unambiguous: no route length or seat class exempts a commercial carrier from this requirement.

The infant restraint issue reflects a regulatory nuance that differs from general passenger expectation. In most jurisdictions, including South Korea, infants under two years of age traveling as lap children are required to use a supplemental loop belt — a short belt that threads through the adult's seatbelt buckle — during taxi, takeoff, landing, and turbulence. This is distinct from the United States, where the FAA technically permits but strongly discourages lap infant travel, recommending instead an approved child restraint system. An adult actively tossing an infant during takeoff roll would represent a clear failure to comply with the supplemental restraint requirement and would be a hazard to both the infant and nearby passengers in the event of an abrupt stop or emergency. Cabin crew are responsible for verifying infant restraint compliance during the safety check prior to departure, making this a crew oversight as much as a passenger behavior issue.

The "Remove Before Flight" streamer or pin observed on an emergency exit is the most technically significant of the three concerns and also the most difficult to assess without direct examination of the photograph. On commercial transport aircraft — including Airbus A320-family variants, which Asiana operates extensively on short-haul routes — emergency slide/raft packs contain safety pins used during ground maintenance and servicing to prevent inadvertent slide deployment. These pins are required to be removed and stowed before the aircraft moves under its own power. If a maintenance safety pin remained installed in an emergency exit slide arming mechanism for the duration of a revenue flight, the slide would likely fail to automatically deploy upon door opening in an evacuation, forcing manual deployment at best and complete slide failure at worst. This would constitute a serious airworthiness discrepancy. It is worth noting, however, that some "Remove Before Flight" tags are attached to components that do not directly affect emergency egress — galley safety pins, equipment stowage locks, or placarded handles on ground-service panels — and a non-aviation passenger may misidentify the location or function of the tagged item. Regardless, any unresolved "Remove Before Flight" item on a departing revenue flight warrants investigation.

Passengers observing potential regulatory violations on commercial flights in South Korea can file reports directly with the Korea Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA Korea), which operates under MOLIT, or through the ICAO Annex 13 safety reporting framework via their home country's aviation authority. Asiana itself operates an internal safety reporting system, and IOSA-audited carriers are required to have a mechanism for receiving and investigating passenger safety concerns. For professional pilots and operators reviewing this account, it serves as a useful reminder that crew resource management and cabin safety culture are not exclusively a cockpit responsibility — briefing compliance, infant restraint verification, and pre-departure safety pin checks are procedural elements that reflect the broader safety management system of an airline, and their consistent execution across high-frequency short-haul operations is precisely where procedural drift most commonly occurs.

Read original article