LIVE · BRIEFING WIRE
FlightLogic Brief Daily aviation wire
← YouTube
● YT VIDEO ·AOPA: Your Freedom to Fly ·August 10, 2026 ·15:00Z

Stunning Gee Bee QED replica at AirVenture

The Mid-America Flight Museum operates a Gee Bee QED replica built in 2012, based on the original 1934 design and the final aircraft in the racer line. The aircraft combines components from various planes, including a Wright 1820 engine from a T-28B, a DC-3 propeller, and an Albatross-style cowling, achieving a cruise speed of 200 knots with maximum speeds near 300 mph. Designed to serve as both an airworthy aircraft and museum display piece, the replica is remarkably stable and well-mannered, reserved primarily for test flights and air show appearances.
Detailed analysis

The Gee Bee QED replica on display at EAA AirVenture Oshkosh represents one of the more unusual preservation stories in the warbird and vintage racing aircraft community. Presented by Kelly McMahon, director of operations for the Mid-America Flight Museum, the aircraft is a faithful replica built around 2012 of the original 1934 Gee Bee QED, the last airplane in Granville Brothers Aviation's famed racer lineage. Unlike the stubby, notoriously unforgiving Gee Bee Model R racers that earned a reputation for killing several of their pilots in the 1930s, the QED was purpose-built as a long-distance, cross-country racer, and McMahon's description of it as "surprisingly stable and very well-mannered" stands in sharp contrast to the mythology surrounding its Model R siblings. That distinction matters for pilots familiar with the Gee Bee name primarily through its dangerous reputation, since it illustrates that not all Granville designs shared the same handling characteristics.

From a performance standpoint, the airplane offers a useful data point for pilots interested in vintage high-performance piston aircraft. With a 200-knot cruise speed, documented speeds approaching 300 mph, a 2.5-hour range, and benign stall characteristics around 83 knots, the QED replica bridges the gap between pure air-racing exotica and a genuinely flyable, tourable aircraft. McMahon's account of approach speeds (100 knots over the fence, touchdown just under 90 knots) and stalls that "didn't do anything bad or weird" reinforces that this replica was engineered not just for static display but for real operational use, including repeated ferry flights to airshows.

Equally notable to builders, restorers, and warbird operators is the aircraft's construction philosophy. Despite its from-scratch appearance, the replica was assembled using a mix of period-correct or period-adjacent components: a Wright R-1820 engine sourced from a T-28B, a propeller pulled from a DC-3, and a cowling design influenced by the Grumman Albatross. This approach reflects a common and pragmatic strategy in the vintage aircraft restoration world, where builders leverage certified, available parts from more common type-certificated aircraft to recreate rare or one-off designs that would otherwise be prohibitively expensive or impossible to reproduce from original tooling. For A&P mechanics, restoration shops, and museum operators, this kind of hybridization underscores how parts commonality across eras and airframes can make ambitious replica projects feasible.

The broader significance of the QED replica ties into the sustained health of the warbird and vintage aircraft preservation ecosystem, which relies heavily on private collectors and small museums like Mid-America Flight Museum to keep rare type histories alive and airworthy rather than relegated to static museum floors. McMahon's comment that the aircraft would still be preserved and displayed even if it hadn't turned out to be a good flying machine speaks to the values driving this segment of general aviation: historical preservation first, with flightworthiness as a bonus that enables outreach and public engagement at events like AirVenture. For corporate and airline pilots attending Oshkosh, aircraft like this serve as a reminder of aviation's experimental and competitive racing roots, and of the volunteer-driven infrastructure — museums, EAA chapters, and private owners — that keeps that history flying rather than gathering dust.

Read original article